john3voltas wrote:1. I don't know peasywifi but from what I've heard connman is the best out there. Too bad connman-gtk-ui is so awful
john3voltas wrote:2. I don't know...packer has been in the heart of alphaos for a long time. :S What exactly is the reason to change to apacman?
john3voltas wrote:Did you talk with simargl about this?
Anniekin wrote:I vote to change to peasy wifi. Connkan crashes alot and it's hard to connect to secure connections. Firefox-gtk3-bin is available in the Aur but I dont like the direction Mozilla has taken. I prefer Chromium or Opera
Scooby wrote:Okay so 1 vote for keeping connman, need at least one more not to switch.
Scooby wrote:I have a bad experience with connman. unstable and slow speed.
But no worries for me I can adjust alphaos to my own needs
Scooby wrote:Any alternatives for connman-ui
Scooby wrote:0.5 better error handling( haven't tried but developer claim it)
1. actively devloped while packer is not.
2. support ABS
It's a fork of packer so no need to learn something new.
Scooby wrote:your reasons not to change is?.....
Scooby wrote:Sim has left the building
john3voltas wrote:Not quite. I just said that I've been told by many people that connman is the best network manager out there but I honestly can't tell if it's true or not. And I didn't say that I was opposed to change
john3voltas wrote:I see. It has worked ok on most of my PC's...
Sure it's not an issue between connman and the drivers?
john3voltas wrote: But if apacman is a better choice I won't stand in your way
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests